"The Epicurus Effect."
Epicurus and his stance?
"For Epicurus, the purpose of philosophy was to help people attain a happy, tranquil life characterized by
ataraxia (peace and freedom from fear) and
aponia (the absence of pain). He advocated that people were best able to pursue philosophy by living a self-sufficient life surrounded by friends. He taught that the root of all human neurosis is death denial and the tendency for human beings to assume that death will be horrific and painful, which he claimed causes unnecessary anxiety, selfish self-protective behaviors, and hypocrisy. According to Epicurus, death is the end of both the body and the soul and therefore should not be feared. Epicurus taught that although the gods exist, they have no involvement in human affairs. He taught that people should behave ethically not because the gods punish or reward people for their actions, but because amoral behavior will burden them with guilt and prevent them from attaining ataraxia."
"Though popular, Epicurean teachings were controversial from the beginning. Epicureanism reached the height of its popularity during the late years of the
Roman Republic. It died out in late antiquity, subject to hostility from
early Christianity. Throughout the
Middle Ages Epicurus was popularly, though inaccurately, remembered as a patron of drunkards, and gluttons. His teachings gradually became more widely known in the fifteenth century with the rediscovery of important texts, but his ideas did not become acceptable until the seventeenth century, when the French Catholic priest
Pierre Gassendi revived a modified version of them, which was promoted by other writers, including
Walter Charleton and
Robert Boyle. His influence grew considerably during and after the
Enlightenment, profoundly impacting the ideas of major thinkers, including
John Locke,
Thomas Jefferson,
Jeremy Bentham, and
Karl Marx."
It would appear that Epicurus, took up an issue with "God's" because it somehow ran against the grain of his individually thought up concepts of "Ataraxia and Aponia?"
It's funny, even Epicurus, who wasn't religious, developed an stance over something that had zero influences over the way this fellow, LIVED his life?
So if no God's, were telling him how to live his Greek life?
And he lived his life, as he chose to do, without any fictional Religious restraints, or fictional Religious Indoctrination practices, keeping him from engaging in the lifestyle that he created from his own non Religious mindset, or his Epicurus stance?
Thus, he didn't really have anything to complain about when it came to any God's, because, those very same God's, were in no way, shape or form keeping him from engaging in his self created Epicurus stance?
So basically he was a non Religious Greek, who was downplaying, on "God's," in general, during his heyday?
This question comes to mind:
It would appear that Epicurus voluntarily allowed the God's to (fictionally interfere) with his philosophies of "Ataraxia, or Aponia," because he developed an issue, with the God's, who weren't consciously interfering in his life to begin with?
So it seems, that the Atheist movement, and the Epicurus stance, can both be viewed in the same (fictional interference) light?
Meaning, Epicurus created a fictional beef, over those same God's who were having a non interference influence, over his very own life, and the lives of those individuals, who adopted his "Ataraxia, or Aponia," philosophies?
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
**** It's funny, even Epicurus, who wasn't religious, developed an stance over something that had zero influences over the way this fellow, LIVED his life?
Epicurus’ philosophy was not based on atheism, but rather on a deistic worldview. Deism posits that gods exist, but do not involve themselves with worldly affairs. By denying the presence of deities in human life, Epicurus wasn’t arguing for an atheistic worldview, but trying to remove the fear of gods, death, and pain that humans experienced
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp;B S    human life   presence of deities   zero influences  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm expressing the exact opposite, and I explained that in the title.
"Epicurus’ philosophy was not based on atheism,,
That Atheism is a byproduct of Epicurus's influence, through his philosophies.
"Is the Atheist movement, a probable byproduct of the Epicurus Effect?"
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Atheism is not a “movement “ and I don’t buy your thesis , either way if it was the case so what?
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Atheism    movement   thesis   way  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Atheism    movement   static   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
The collective group of Atheists on the internet, are using the Internet, as a platform to indoctrinate whoever they can with their Atheist movement narratives.
An example, your individual narratives @ZeusAres42.
Your individual narratives @Dee.
Your individual narratives @Happy_Killbot
And your individual narratives as well @Plaffelvohfen
Look at how many pro Atheist websites that there are on the Internet?
The Atheist Revolution is a prime example of a collective of Atheists via their own website, who just like you three, are using the internet to push their collective Atheist narratives as well?
The NRA is another example of a collective movement, using the internet, to push their narratives to.
Black Lives Matter, another example of a collective movement.
How many White Supremacy groups, are there on the internet?
They are another example of a collective movement, using the internet to push their narratives as well.
The GOP, on the internet, is another collective movement, using the internet, to push their narratives, just like the Liberal Socialists movement, is using the internet, in the same way.
"Atheism is as much of a movement as static is being dynamic."
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
http://www.atheistsites.net/?gclid=CjwKCAiAmNbwBRBOEiwAqcwwpYJrh-CROXSlbyivRIggqI9fFsSTVTfrekmJp8uWqPEJO9O9qg_MORoCGvgQAvD_BwE
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Atheist movements    websites   accompanying narrative    
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.24  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.14  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: byproduct of a rational mind    Atheism   OP    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 65%  
  Learn More About Debra
This is the theme of the forum:
Is the Atheist movement, a probable byproduct of the Epicurus Effect?
Do you have an actual counter argument to present?
More examples of your Atheist pushing narratives:
"Have you consulted with a Shrink at all lately?"
"Or have you actually seen multiple shrinks in the past that have all concluded that you are a lost cause?"
"I'm guessing the latter."
"Perhaps you told all the shrinks that they are wrong and only see things from their own collective point of view no matter what they said?"
"Hey, perhaps you even started having a debate with them about some current Shrink movement?"
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 43%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: own sake    difference   Atheism   bigger fool  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
He can probably be conditioned to behave in certain ways but I wouldn't call that learning... As his numerous posts and comments in the last year demonstrate, he is unable to learn...
I mean, we would have seen some form of progress by now, however small and on at least one issue (whether it's about the difference between atheism and antitheism , "what is an argument", "how to structure it" or more basically "how to address an argument"...), but there is none, no progress at all... So I wouldn't get my hopes too high for 2020 either...
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
A lack of study or research insures ignorance.
1. Epistemology is the study and theory of knowledge.
The Greeks did not understand how someone can know anything, as certainty, in respect to knowledge, confounded them as certainty asserts that knowledge is fundamental.
Epistemology covers
Justified beilief
Or certainty
The Greeks argued about an empirical means to be certain of what is known
The problem was Greeks did not take into account rationality or inherant intelligence
Science, was first invented as
1. A way to prove God exists
2. As an empirical means of certainty
Ontology is the study of being and the ontological quality of existence
To run this short because I'm not interested in giving a history lesson
1. Psuedo scientists hijacked science and were dogmatic in the approach of the philosophy of science
It's why you had people saying things like people live on the sun in the 12th century by "scientists"
2. Psuedo-scientists intended to use science as a way to attempt to do the impossible and assert God doesn't exist, a fallacy.
3. Psuedo scientists assert illogical concepts, use words that people barely understand, fail miserably in all century's and eras, any inventor, or engineer is labeled a scientist by the psuedo scientists, psuedo pscientists jump on the bandwagon of inventor, psuedo scientists use inventors as a social proof for science,psuedo scientists get in front of audiences , use words audiences largely can not comprehend, the false social proof of inventors is a psychological tactic to assert psuedo-scientists
Are smart
Psuedo scientists aim everything at the Bible
And tradically atheists result neither knowing the history of science or much of anything else.
Jesus is Lord
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** And tradically atheists result neither knowing the history of science or much of anything else
Say’s the guy who believes History and science are to be found in a fairytale that has a guy called Noah building a boat that held two of every animal in the world .....Bwaaaaaaahahahahahaha
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.44  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: history of science    JesusisGod777888   atheists result   guy  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
Atheism is as old as humanity is, and so is religion. I do not see any reason to connect Epicureanism to the emergence of the "atheist movement" (whatever it is), albeit it may have contributed to it in some indirect way.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.04  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 75%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Cro Magnon Man    Science   fairytale   earth-wide ice  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
*****Science has a fairytale that has a Cro Magnon Man surviving 5 earth-wide ice ages
We are living in an ice age now and yet we survive. It’s startling you think science believes in fairytales yet you believe in a resurrected Jesus , do you not think that strange?
*****no boat, no house, no preparation whatsoever, just happened.
Who told you this
****This fairytale Apelike Man not only survived but lived in it for 100,000 years, no food, no shelter, no clothing.
Again where did you get this misinformation from?
****Good thing hypothermia wasn't discovered yet.
Right???
At least five major ice ages have occurred throughout Earth’s history: the earliest was over 2 billion years ago, and the most recent one began approximately 3 million years ago and continues today (yes, we live in an ice age!). Currently, we are in a warm interglacial that began about 11,000 years ago. The last period of glaciation, which is often informally called the “Ice Age,” peaked about 20,000 years ago. At that time, the world was on average probably about 10°F (5°C) colder than today, and locally as much as 40°F (22°C) colder.
The Neanderthals were replaced throughout Europe about 40,000 years ago by modern humans - Homo sapiens sapiens - called Cro-Magnon Man after the French village where their remains were discovered. The brains of Cro-Magnons were no bigger than those of the Neanderthals, but they put them to new uses.
Cro-Magnons brought with them the full range of modern human behaviours - sculpture, painting, elaborate burial of the dead, ornamentation of utilitarian objects, and so on. They were mighty hunters and in some of their caves they began to draw and paint the animals they hunted: mammoths, horses, wild oxen, bison, rhinoceros and reindeer. They supported some of their fellows as full-time artists. Also, many of their caves were used only for ritual worship. The achievements of the Cro-Magnons stand in stark contrast to those of the Neanderthals or any other hominids. The radically new behaviours of the Cro-Magnons were clearly underpinned by a new capacity to think symbolically. Understanding how this came about is one of the most interesting puzzles in biology.
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Cro Magnon Man    brains of Cro-Magnons   new uses.Cro-Magnons   modern humans  
  Relevant (Beta): 40%  
  Learn More About Debra
>>>Who told you this<<<
>>>Again where did you get this misinformation from?<<<
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/prehistoric-world/quaternary/
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.9  
  Sources: 3  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lt    fairy tale   evidence   gt  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Right so your contention then is Jesus wasn’t really dead?
Your last link makes no sense regards the matter at hand
Lol
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Cro Mangan man    such findings   last link   contention  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
1. There was no "earth-wide" ice ages, there was temperate climate at the equatorial longitudes where humans could survive with relative ease...
2. Cro-Magnon was not around for the first big 4 (the Huronian (2.4-2.1 billion years ago), Cryogenian (850-635 million years ago), Andean-Saharan (460-430 mya), Karoo (360-260 mya)).
Cro-Magnon appeared quite late in the Quaternary period around 40k years ago...
3. Incredible and astonishing that mammals can survive in harsh winter conditions eh? How do wolves, elks, rabbits do it?? I mean, no boat, no house, no clothes, no food, no shelter, seems impossible right? After all, humans only knew how to control fire since Homo Erectus, so over 1 million years before Cro-Magnon.............
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 66%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 71%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 54%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.9  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Neanderthals are more primitive but stronger. Cro-Magnons are us. I really don’t know what point you’re attempting to make and your reference to Piltdown man is beyond me. So could you explain what is the fairytale you’re referring to?
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 51%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Cro-Magnons    Piltdown man   point   Neanderthals  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
Cro-Magnons are us, so again I do not know what you’re hoping to achieve but there you go
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Cro-Magnons    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
That study does not say anything of the kind. It explores possible contamination of certain samples and its impact on certain findings. It by no means shows that Neanderthals have not existed.
It is a pretty sophisticated study, hard to read for non-experts even with a huge experience in reading scientific literature. It is going to be near-impenetrable to non-experts with no or little of such experience. If you are not sure in your ability to go through it and understand it, then the least you can do is to not make far-fetched conclusions that the study by no means suggests.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: possible contamination of certain samples    scientific literature   ability   huge experience  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yet you said ...... Study shows that Neandertals or Cro-Magnoids are nothing more than anatomically-archaic Europeans
Now you’re saying they’re ......fairytales .....oh dear
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 43%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 69%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Study shows    Cro-Magnoids   archaic EuropeansNow   fairytales  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.84  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 30%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: information         
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: impact of various influences    natural reaction   atheism   credible evidence  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am not an expert, but genealogical continuity does not imply equality. There is genealogical continuity between crocodiles from 250 million years ago and today's crocodiles, but they are different species, albeit they do have a lot of similarities.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: genealogical continuity    different species   today's crocodiles   crocodiles  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: people's definition    different species.Who   different species   similar individuals  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
This definition seems incomplete. We consider horses and donkeys different species, even though they are capable of interbreeding - however their offspring is sterile. And some different rodent species can interbreed and even produce fertile offspring, and they are still considered different species.
It is commonly believed, for example, that Neanderthals have contributed up to 5% genes to the modern humans. However, they are still a separate evolutionary branch, now extinct. You could argue that technically they are not different species, based on your definition - but they are considered different by science, mostly due to the systematic genetic differences between them. Some genes being exchanged still can leave the overall genetic makeup between two groups of animals quite different.
What do you mean by "we cannot interbreed now"? With whom? All the species genetically similar to humans are considered humans and can interbreed just fine. You could ask why humans cannot interbreed with apes (at least, as far as we know - the experiments have been very scarce, for ethical reasons), and that is a very complex question - but apes are pretty far away from us in terms of genetic makeup, so it should not be very surprising.
There are no non-human species we know of around that are generically very similar to us. It may have been different in the past, before we raised to the top of the food chain and exterminated our primary competitors.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Dee
@MayCaesar
@kenpage
This is the theme of the forum:
"Is the Atheist movement, a probable byproduct of the Epicurus Effect?"
Everyone of you are off topic.Please, get back on topic.
If you have an issue with that request, please take it up with Aarong.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 77%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: top of their food chain    types of Neanderthals   types of apes   Homo erectus  
  Relevant (Beta): 56%  
  Learn More About Debra
Many species have eliminated their competitors in their primary habitats. For example, crocodiles dominate the Australian rivers and do not really compete with anything. Humans' habitat simply happens to be the entire Earth.
In addition to that, humans possess intelligence, something no other animal does, and are able to eliminate competitors at a much faster rate; faster than the rate of those competitors' replacement through breeding. Or so the evidence suggests, at any rate.
We did come from animals interbreeding. We have simply eliminated the products of other parallel evolutionary branches.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Humans' habitat    entire Earth.In addition   primary habitats   faster rate  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** You are off topic.
Please, get back on topic.
If you have an issue with that request, please take it up with Aarong.
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 73%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: nbsp    issue   request   topic.Please  
  Relevant (Beta): 9%  
  Learn More About Debra
The below is the evidence of your off topic commentary:
@MayCaesar
"Many species have eliminated their competitors in their primary habitats. For example, crocodiles dominate the Australian rivers and do not really compete with anything. Humans' habitat simply happens to be the entire Earth.
In addition to that, humans possess intelligence, something no other animal does, and are able to eliminate competitors at a much faster rate; faster than the rate of those competitors' replacement through breeding. Or so the evidence suggests, at any rate.
We did come from animals interbreeding. We have simply eliminated the products of other parallel evolutionary branches."
@Dee
**** You are off topic.
"Please, get back on topic.
If you have an issue with that request, please take it up with Aarong."
@Sand
Please, get back on topic.
"Is the Atheist movement, a probable byproduct of the Epicurus Effect?"
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 10%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: exchanging of genes    species   chromosomes    
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 24%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: new topic    discussion      
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
"Please, get back on topic.
If you have an issue with that request, please take it up with Aarong."
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 75%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
Back your claim up?
Show the public, your video evidence from your and Epicuru's conversation, where this historic moment took place?
"After many years of BEING atheistic I heard of Epicurus, and he agreed with MY theory. "
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.42  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: lot of strides    atheism   explanation   case  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
The atheist movement has always been around but it did get a shot in the arm when the world learned that logic and reason worked much better to describe reality than supernatural thinking.
This documentary goes into greater detail of how people embraced logos instead of mythos to explain the world.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06542cg
Regards
DL
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.3  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: doubtful.The atheist movement    supernatural thinking.This documentary   premise   greater detail  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra